University of Florida Homepage

The Bot Imperative

The current debate over the ethics of automation misses a key question that both the public and companies need to consider: When is it unethical to not replace—or augment—humans with AI? @ Information Week

Comedy and Culture

Comedy can often give offense, especially when it concerns such sensitive topics as race, gender, and sexuality. Should comedy like that be shunned, boycotted, even banned? Can it be enjoyed without danger? Or could it even, at its best, be the road to a better society? Could it somehow help us all to live together, and to come to terms with intractable social issues we’ll never fully put behind us? [audio] @ Philosophy Talk

Inexplicable Technology

People distrust artificial intelligence. Many organizations have prioritized AI complexity over explainability. Complex AI algorithms allow us to get results that were previously unattainable. However, the blackbox nature of these systems means it isn’t straightforward to understand the logic behind how the systems are doing what they are doing. @ Forbes

Privacy and the Gender Binary

In some cases resisting the gender binary can be a push for privacy, a challenge to our social practice of figuring out what gender a person is immediately, pretty much before we figure out anything else about them. This immediately gives rise to come pretty interesting ethical questions. [audio] — Univ of Chicago

AI Goes to War

The Pentagon takes the next big step of deploying artificial intelligence to aid troops and help select battlefield targets, amid lingering ethical concerns about using the technology for waging war. — Bloomberg Govt

Conscious Machines

Computers have already surpassed us in their ability to perform certain cognitive tasks. Perhaps it won’t be long till every household has a super intelligent robot who can outperform us in almost every domain. While future AI might be excellent at appearing conscious, could AI ever actually become conscious? Would forcing conscious robots to work for us be akin to slavery? And could we design AI that specifically lacks consciousness, or is consciousness an emergent property of intelligence? [audio] — Philosophy Talk

The Paradox of Dogmatism

Is refusing to consider evidence against one’s views always wrong? Saul Kripke – widely regarded as the most influential analytic philosopher alive today – explores what we should do when faced with things that don’t quite add up. [video] — Institute of Art and Ideas

AI, Ethics and Education

AI holds enormous potential for transforming the way we teach. At a certain point it may be unethical for us not to use AI. But whenever we talk about transforming something—like educational institutions, we should ask what we will be transforming it into. [audio] — Future Tense

The Trouble with Humanism

If you believe that as a human being, your rights and interests carry more moral weight than the rights and interests of a cat or a chicken, then you’re most likely a humanist. But should you be? How well does humanism’s account of itself hold up in philosophical terms? —Philosopher’s Zone

Earth, Air, Fire and Water

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a new entry on the ancient Greek philosopher Empedocles. In the middle of the fifth century BCE, Empedocles of Acragas pioneered the influential four-part theory of roots (air, water, earth, and fire) along with two active principles of Love and Strife, which influenced later philosophy, medicine, mysticism, cosmology, and religion. The philosophical system responded to Parmenides’ rejection of change while embracing religious injunctions and magical practices. As a result, Empedocles has occupied a significant position in the history of Presocratic philosophy as a figure moving between mythos and logos, religion and science.

Have We Reached the Limit?

Since human brains were evolutionarily adapted to solve practical problems impinging on our survival and reproduction, not to unravel the theoretical fabric of the universe, some philosophers argue there are bound to be things we will never understand. Human science will therefore one day hit a hard limit – and may already have done so. But does this argument hold up? Philosopher Maarten Boudry discusses.

On Misgendering

Misgendering is when someone addresses someone else in a way that corresponds to the wrong gender. There are some people who don’t care at all, and they constitute interesting edge cases that we should take seriously. But a lot of people do care, and there’s some work to be done explaining why. Philosopher Stephanie Kapusta lays out some of the basic reasons why misgendering someone is a kind of moral harm. (audio)

On Wildly Implausible Ideas

Some philosophers have drawn very strange conclusions about the nature of reality. But that doesn’t necessarily mean we shouldn’t study their work. Historian of philosophy Emily Thomas discusses how wildly implausible metaphysics can be enlightening when we learn the reasons why these philosophers adopted these positions. (audio)

Does That AI Have Your Best Interest at Heart (or Someone Else’s)?

“Don’t be evil,” now seems both prescient and naive. As we create systems that are more capable of understanding and targeting services at individual users, our capacity to do evil by automating bias and weaponizing algorithms will grow exponentially. [For companies that use such technology,] merely complying with the law has never been more perilous, nor more morally insufficient.

The Dogged Philosopher

Dogs are a bridge between nature and culture, between the world of the animal kingdom, and the human kingdom and civilization. An interview with philosopher Mark Alizart on the subject of his recent book Dogs: A Philosophical Guide to Our Best Friends.

AI Ethics and Power

AI has been called one of the great human rights challenges of the 21st century. And it’s not just about doing the right thing or making the best AI systems possible, it’s about who wields power and how AI affects the balance of power in everything it touches.